The 1971 ‘Collector’s Items’ Label – And Its CBM Copies

Santana Live ColItem IISantana Live ColItemSantana Live ColItem III

Santana Live ColItem lbl

I believe this label might belong to the Japanese copy of this album shown here. It certainly differs from the clearer and stronger print in the image above it. Easily spotted is the difference between a laminated cover on the original and the wraparound large insert used on the copy.

Santana Live 104Santana Live 104 bSantana Live 104 detail

The artwork states: “This two-record set was professionally recorded at one of the finest concert halls in the nation. Eight microphones were utilized by the sound crew on stage to achieve the flawless quality of sound that is evident throughout the entire album. It captures the peaks of excitement and emotion that accompany a live Santana concert.”

Source: Soundboard recording recorded live at the Winterland, San Francisco, CA from one of these nights: December 18-21/1969

Santana Winterland 69

Side 1: Conquistadore Rides Again (5:40) / You Just Don’t Care (5:26) / Fried Neckbones And Some Home Fries (7:10)
Side 2: Waiting (6:14) / Treat (9:16) / Gumbo (4:25)
Side 3: Evil Ways (4:31) / Shades Of Time>Savor Jingo (14:50)
Side 4: Persuasion (3:00) / Soul Sacrifice PT 1 / Shrieve Solo / Soul Sacrifice PT 2 (15:24)

The back of the album mentions the song “Singing Winds, Crying Beasts”, which is not present here and would not come out until September of 1970 (on their second album Abraxas), which helps us date this bootleg to ca. 1971.

 

Owner review:

“The Side One and Two record in this two-LP had dozens of small pimples on the surfaces, and if you saw what the record looks like, you’d be amazed that it plays this well, though there are occasional low-pitched thumps due to the pressing imperfections.

“Fortunately, Side Three and Four are free from this problem, and you get a scorching soundboard by the Santana lineup heard on their debut album. The group plays the entirety of their first album, plus three unreleased selections (Instrumental Introduction, Gumbo and Fried Neckbones).”

 

***

Selections were copied by CBM as # 3553 in 1972:

Santana Collectors Item 7

***

A European bootleg on blue PVC under the title Singing Winds, Crying Beasts (KURLY 5006/7) is also supposed to exist. Does anyone have an image of it? I have found no trace of it – neither have I of Volume 2 that is supposed to exist for the CBM copy.

 

****

Young N Collector's Item

Probably the first release of the Music hall Cincinnati, 25 February 1970 soundboard tape that I have already mentioned twice on this blog.

***

Again, selections were copied by CBM as a single album in 1973 (as # 3940):

Young N & Crazy Horse 3

and from there onto GLC’s ‘YOUNG & OLD’ ca late 1974/early 1975: 

Young & Old 2

****

Who LIVE! c.itemWho LIVE! c.item bWho LIVE! c.item detail

A very good audience recording of the middle of the set list at their show in Dayton, Ohio – 13 August 1971. As previously featured here.

***

The Who Collector's Item 2The Who Collector's Item 3

Copied in early 1973 by CBM as # 3669 – and the most obvious copy of them all, right down to the original art work.

Due to the very good recording quality, the recording was copied again by Berkeley – first in their fold-out cover design – designing new covers in red and green but keeping the font – and later with a b&w deluxe cover.

The Who Collector's Item

K&S released it again in 1979.

****

The original version was in a blue laminated jacket with blue labels with printed track listings [as shown above].  There are allegedly 500 pressed by someone in the Cincinnati area shortly after the concert.  I saw both this and Neil Young & Crazy Horse Collector’s Item in a record store in Muncie, Indiana in late October of 1971.  The originals were of better quality than the numerous later copies. ”

 

Were there any other releases by this “label”? I have never seen any. It would be nice to find out who was behind this ambitious project with an eye on quality releases in matching cover art.

Advertisements
6 comments
  1. John said:

    Never understand the ‘collectors item'(s) title(s) mentioned by it’s producers.Who decide which/what is a collectors item?
    In my opinion to call an item a real collectors item is that years after producing…. and searching,looking , for items seldom seen…., and collectors found out that releases which are really limited pressings or seized are the ‘real ‘ collectors items. F.e…years ago i bought on the Amsterdam Waterloo plein a blue vinyl record. I’d rather liked the royal blue colour and the title wasn’t in my possesion ( normally when i saw interesting titles to collect i bought more copies from a certain title, just to trade with pen palls or fellow collectors) . So i asked the guy if he had more copies from this title, but he had only recieved one. And i could deal with it. Later in the year i received from one of my suppliers a phonecall….’interested in ….. ?. Sure i answered, and please can you tell me what colour is the wax?…It was on stunnig yellow , he told me.and i have 2 copies for you.!! To make the story a short one….after years of collecting i found out that that yellow one was limited to 300 copies and the blue one only reaches the ammount of only 50 pieces. ( And that is what i call a real collectors item.. 🙂 .

  2. Karl said:

    I guess these people just wanted to express that these are not records for the casual listener, instead they are for collectors of these artists. Some of the old boot catalouges use description such as “Underground Records” or “Coollector’s Records”.

    • John said:

      could be, Karl….but do you think that they want to warn buyers not buying their records not for the ‘normal’ listener?…i think they wouldn’t give a damn who bought their stuff…(.i think it’s still a ridiculous title…!!) It is the same as when i sell some grass to people and warn them not to smoke it ’cause you might get in a happy and relaxed mood..!! 🙂

      • Erik T said:

        Hi-
        I was looking for whatI thought was a comment I made here last night before I head out today… Anyhow, I would think labelling something a collectors item was a sort of disclaimer with regard to sound quality- perhaps so regular record listeners wouldn’t buy it, get disappointed and take the records back to a store that probably doesn’t want any problems with angry record buyers. Just a guess. I heard bootlegs used to be cheaper than Regular releases, and that head shops used to sell them, especially in towns where the local record store wouldn’t want to piss off their suppliers. I’ve seen legit records qualifying (relatively) poor sound quality with the ‘collectible’ angle, again I suspect as a sort of disclaimer.

  3. chris said:

    I have the The Who album issued by Berkley Recs with their “traditional” black and white printed cover

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: